![]() X-Rite Colormunki smile is a no go, read some terrible reviews about its senor or filter which makes it sound like it would have lots more troubles than ColorHug1.Īlso discovered many negative experiences about Spyder and their organic filters fading leaving the impression that Spyder Express might not be a long term device. So my conclusion is this, the best selection would be the X-Rite Colormunki Display which is completely out of my budget. The more I read, the deeper the dark wood becomes. I think it would be great if there was a forum dedicated for hardware related things like recommended stuff for opensource imagery. I am full time Linux so Linux compatibility is a must. ![]() So if you were in my shoes which one would you pick? Colorhug2 or SPyder4Express. However there are some things on Colorhug website that seems to indicate it might have some advantages like ambient light capture (lux and XYZ) as opposed to Spyder pro only Lux and I think Spyder4Express has this option stripped away. I am leaning towards Colorhug2, but Spyder4Express now is on sale at a local store and I can get it 5 euros cheaper than Colorhug as well as I am sure that I get no trouble with guarantee service should I need repairs. One is open source hardware called Colorhug2 and the other one is Spyder4Express. I fear my current ICC profile while being okay might be outdated now. ![]() So I am considering to get a calibration device to calibrate my computer’s monitor. I came across an interesting headache and am wondering what would be your advice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |